Database table partitioning
WARNING:
If you have questions not answered below, check for and add them
to this issue.
Tag @gitlab-org/database-team/triage
and we'll get back to you with an
answer as soon as possible. If you get an answer in Slack, document
it on the issue as well so we can update this document in the future.
Table partitioning is a powerful database feature that allows a table's data to be split into smaller physical tables that act as a single large table. If the application is designed to work with partitioning in mind, there can be multiple benefits, such as:
-
Query performance can be improved greatly, because the database can cheaply eliminate much of the data from the search space, while still providing full SQL capabilities.
-
Bulk deletes can be achieved with minimal impact on the database by dropping entire partitions. This is a natural fit for features that need to periodically delete data that falls outside the retention window.
-
Administrative tasks like
VACUUM
and index rebuilds can operate on individual partitions, rather than across a single massive table.
Unfortunately, not all models fit a partitioning scheme, and there are significant drawbacks if implemented incorrectly. Additionally, tables can only be partitioned at their creation, making it nontrivial to apply partitioning to a busy database. A suite of migration tools are available to enable backend developers to partition existing tables, but the migration process is rather heavy, taking multiple steps split across several releases. Due to the limitations of partitioning and the related migrations, you should understand how partitioning fits your use case before attempting to leverage this feature.
Determine when to use partitioning
While partitioning can be very useful when properly applied, it's imperative to identify if the data and workload of a table naturally fit a partitioning scheme. Understand a few details to decide if partitioning is a good fit for your particular problem:
-
Table partitioning. A table is partitioned on a partition key, which is a column or set of columns which determine how the data is split across the partitions. The partition key is used by the database when reading or writing data, to decide which partitions must be accessed. The partition key should be a column that would be included in a
WHERE
clause on almost all queries accessing that table. -
How the data is split. What strategy does the database use to split the data across the partitions? The available choices are
range
,hash
, andlist
.
Determine the appropriate partitioning strategy
The available partitioning strategy choices are range
, hash
, and list
.
Range partitioning
The scheme best supported by the GitLab migration helpers is date-range partitioning, where each partition in the table contains data for a single month. In this case, the partitioning key must be a timestamp or date column. For this type of partitioning to work well, most queries must access data in a certain date range.
For a more concrete example, consider using the audit_events
table.
It was the first table to be partitioned in the application database
(scheduled for deployment with the GitLab 13.5 release). This
table tracks audit entries of security events that happen in the
application. In almost all cases, users want to see audit activity that
occurs in a certain time frame. As a result, date-range partitioning
was a natural fit for how the data would be accessed.
To look at this in more detail, imagine a simplified audit_events
schema:
CREATE TABLE audit_events (
id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
author_id INT NOT NULL,
details jsonb NOT NULL,
created_at timestamptz NOT NULL);
Now imagine typical queries in the UI would display the data in a certain date range, like a single week:
SELECT *
FROM audit_events
WHERE created_at >= '2020-01-01 00:00:00'
AND created_at < '2020-01-08 00:00:00'
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 100
If the table is partitioned on the created_at
column the base table would
look like:
CREATE TABLE audit_events (
id SERIAL NOT NULL,
author_id INT NOT NULL,
details jsonb NOT NULL,
created_at timestamptz NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (id, created_at))
PARTITION BY RANGE(created_at);
NOTE: The primary key of a partitioned table must include the partition key as part of the primary key definition.
And we might have a list of partitions for the table, such as:
audit_events_202001 FOR VALUES FROM ('2020-01-01') TO ('2020-02-01')
audit_events_202002 FOR VALUES FROM ('2020-02-01') TO ('2020-03-01')
audit_events_202003 FOR VALUES FROM ('2020-03-01') TO ('2020-04-01')
Each partition is a separate physical table, with the same structure as
the base audit_events
table, but contains only data for rows where the
partition key falls in the specified range. For example, the partition
audit_events_202001
contains rows where the created_at
column is
greater than or equal to 2020-01-01
and less than 2020-02-01
.
Now, if we look at the previous example query again, the database can
use the WHERE
to recognize that all matching rows are in the
audit_events_202001
partition. Rather than searching all of the data
in all of the partitions, it can search only the single month's worth
of data in the appropriate partition. In a large table, this can
dramatically reduce the amount of data the database needs to access.
However, imagine a query that does not filter based on the partitioning
key, such as:
SELECT *
FROM audit_events
WHERE author_id = 123
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 100
In this example, the database can't prune any partitions from the search,
because matching data could exist in any of them. As a result, it has to
query each partition individually, and aggregate the rows into a single result
set. Because author_id
would be indexed, the performance impact could
likely be acceptable, but on more complex queries the overhead can be
substantial. Partitioning should only be leveraged if the access patterns
of the data support the partitioning strategy, otherwise performance
suffers.
Hash Partitioning
Hash partitioning splits a logical table into a series of partitioned
tables. Each partition corresponds to the ID range that matches
a hash and remainder. For example, if partitioning BY HASH(id)
, rows
with hash(id) % 64 == 1
would end up in the partition
WITH (MODULUS 64, REMAINDER 1)
.
When hash partitioning, you must include a WHERE hashed_column = ?
condition in
every performance-sensitive query issued by the application. If this is not possible,
hash partitioning may not be the correct fit for your use case.
Hash partitioning has one main advantage: it is the only type of partitioning that
can enforce uniqueness on a single numeric id
column. (While also possible with
range partitioning, it's rarely the correct choice).
Hash partitioning has downsides:
- The number of partitions must be known up-front.
- It's difficult to move new data to an extra partition if current partitions become too large.
- Range queries, such as
WHERE id BETWEEN ? and ?
, are unsupported. - Lookups by other keys, such as
WHERE other_id = ?
, are unsupported.
For this reason, it's often best to choose a large number of hash partitions to accommodate future table growth.
Partitioning a table (Range)
Unfortunately, tables can only be partitioned at their creation, making it nontrivial to apply to a busy database. A suite of migration tools have been developed to enable backend developers to partition existing tables. This migration process takes multiple steps which must be split across several releases.
Caveats
The partitioning migration helpers work by creating a partitioned duplicate of the original table and using a combination of a trigger and a background migration to copy data into the new table. Changes to the original table schema can be made in parallel with the partitioning migration, but they must take care to not break the underlying mechanism that makes the migration work. For example, if a column is added to the table that is being partitioned, both the partitioned table and the trigger definition must be updated to match.
Step 1: Creating the partitioned copy (Release N)
The first step is to add a migration to create the partitioned copy of the original table. This migration creates the appropriate partitions based on the data in the original table, and install a trigger that syncs writes from the original table into the partitioned copy.
An example migration of partitioning the audit_events
table by its
created_at
column would look like:
class PartitionAuditEvents < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
include Gitlab::Database::PartitioningMigrationHelpers
def up
partition_table_by_date :audit_events, :created_at
end
def down
drop_partitioned_table_for :audit_events
end
end
After this has executed, any inserts, updates, or deletes in the original table are also duplicated in the new table. For updates and deletes, the operation only has an effect if the corresponding row exists in the partitioned table.
Step 2: Backfill the partitioned copy (Release N)
The second step is to add a post-deployment migration that schedules the background jobs that backfill existing data from the original table into the partitioned copy.
Continuing the above example, the migration would look like:
class BackfillPartitionAuditEvents < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
include Gitlab::Database::PartitioningMigrationHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
restrict_gitlab_migration gitlab_schema: :gitlab_main
def up
enqueue_partitioning_data_migration :audit_events
end
def down
cleanup_partitioning_data_migration :audit_events
end
end
This step queues a batched background migration internally with BATCH_SIZE and SUB_BATCH_SIZE as 50,000
and 2,500
. Refer Batched Background migrations guide for more details.
Step 3: Post-backfill cleanup (Release N+1)
This step must occur at least one release after the release that includes step (2). This gives time for the background migration to execute properly in self-managed installations. In this step, add another post-deployment migration that cleans up after the background migration. This includes forcing any remaining jobs to execute, and copying data that may have been missed, due to dropped or failed jobs.
Once again, continuing the example, this migration would look like:
class CleanupPartitionedAuditEventsBackfill < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
include Gitlab::Database::PartitioningMigrationHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
restrict_gitlab_migration gitlab_schema: :gitlab_main
def up
finalize_backfilling_partitioned_table :audit_events
end
def down
# no op
end
end
After this migration completes, the original table and partitioned table should contain identical data. The trigger installed on the original table guarantees that the data remains in sync going forward.
Step 4: Swap the partitioned and non-partitioned tables (Release N+1)
This step replaces the non-partitioned table with its partitioned copy, this should be used only after all other migration steps have completed successfully.
Some limitations to this method MUST be handled before, or during, the swap migration:
- Secondary indexes and foreign keys are not automatically recreated on the partitioned table.
- Some types of constraints (UNIQUE and EXCLUDE) which rely on indexes, are not automatically recreated on the partitioned table, since the underlying index will not be present.
- Foreign keys referencing the original non-partitioned table should be updated to reference the partitioned table. This is not supported in PostgreSQL 11.
- Views referencing the original table are not automatically updated to reference the partitioned table.
# frozen_string_literal: true
class SwapPartitionedAuditEvents < ActiveRecord::Migration[6.0]
include Gitlab::Database::PartitioningMigrationHelpers
def up
replace_with_partitioned_table :audit_events
end
def down
rollback_replace_with_partitioned_table :audit_events
end
end
After this migration completes:
- The partitioned table replaces the non-partitioned (original) table.
- The sync trigger created earlier is dropped.
The partitioned table is now ready for use by the application.
Partitioning a table (Hash)
Hash partitioning divides data into partitions based on a hash of their ID.
It works well only if most queries against the table include a clause like WHERE id = ?
,
so that PostgreSQL can decide which partition to look in based on the ID or ids being requested.
Another key downside is that hash partitioning does not allow adding additional partitions after table creation. The correct number of partitions must be chosen up-front.
Hash partitioning is the only type of partitioning (aside from some complex uses of list partitioning) that can guarantee uniqueness of an ID across multiple partitions at the database level.
Partitioning a table (List)
Introduced in GitLab 15.4.
Add the partitioning key column to the table you are partitioning. Include the partitioning key in the following constraints:
- The primary key.
- All foreign keys referencing the table to be partitioned.
- All unique constraints.
Step 1 - Add partition key
Add the partitioning key column. For example, in a rails migration:
class AddPartitionNumberForPartitioning < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
enable_lock_retries!
TABLE_NAME = :table_name
COLUMN_NAME = :partition_id
DEFAULT_VALUE = 100
def change
add_column(TABLE_NAME, COLUMN_NAME, :bigint, default: 100)
end
end
Step 2 - Create required indexes
Add indexes including the partitioning key column. For example, in a rails migration:
class PrepareIndexesForPartitioning < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
disable_ddl_transaction!
TABLE_NAME = :table_name
INDEX_NAME = :index_name
def up
add_concurrent_index(TABLE_NAME, [:id, :partition_id], unique: true, name: INDEX_NAME)
end
def down
remove_concurrent_index_by_name(TABLE_NAME, INDEX_NAME)
end
end
Step 3 - Enforce unique constraint
Change all unique indexes to include the partitioning key column,
including the primary key index. You can start by adding an unique
index on [primary_key_column, :partition_id]
, which will be
required for the next two steps. For example, in a rails migration:
class PrepareUniqueContraintForPartitioning < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
disable_ddl_transaction!
TABLE_NAME = :table_name
OLD_UNIQUE_INDEX_NAME = :index_name_unique
NEW_UNIQUE_INDEX_NAME = :new_index_name
def up
add_concurrent_index(TABLE_NAME, [:id, :partition_id], unique: true, name: NEW_UNIQUE_INDEX_NAME)
remove_concurrent_index_by_name(TABLE_NAME, OLD_UNIQUE_INDEX_NAME)
end
def down
add_concurrent_index(TABLE_NAME, :id, unique: true, name: OLD_UNIQUE_INDEX_NAME)
remove_concurrent_index_by_name(TABLE_NAME, NEW_UNIQUE_INDEX_NAME)
end
end
Step 4 - Enforce foreign key constraint
Enforce foreign keys including the partitioning key column. For example, in a rails migration:
class PrepareForeignKeyForPartitioning < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
disable_ddl_transaction!
SOURCE_TABLE_NAME = :source_table_name
TARGET_TABLE_NAME = :target_table_name
COLUMN = :foreign_key_id
TARGET_COLUMN = :id
FK_NAME = :fk_365d1db505_p
PARTITION_COLUMN = :partition_id
def up
add_concurrent_foreign_key(
SOURCE_TABLE_NAME,
TARGET_TABLE_NAME,
column: [PARTITION_COLUMN, COLUMN],
target_column: [PARTITION_COLUMN, TARGET_COLUMN],
validate: false,
on_update: :cascade,
name: FK_NAME
)
# This should be done in a separate post migration when dealing with a high traffic table
validate_foreign_key(TABLE_NAME, [PARTITION_COLUMN, COLUMN], name: FK_NAME)
end
def down
with_lock_retries do
remove_foreign_key_if_exists(SOURCE_TABLE_NAME, name: FK_NAME)
end
end
end
The on_update: :cascade
option is mandatory if we want the partitioning column
to be updated. This will cascade the update to all dependent rows. Without
specifying it, updating the partition column on the target table we would
result in a Key is still referenced from table ...
error and updating the
partition column on the source table would raise a
Key is not present in table ...
error.
This migration can be automatically generated using:
./scripts/partitioning/generate-fk --source source_table_name --target target_table_name
Step 5 - Swap primary key
Swap the primary key including the partitioning key column. This can be done only after including the partition key for all references foreign keys. For example, in a rails migration:
class PreparePrimaryKeyForPartitioning < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
disable_ddl_transaction!
TABLE_NAME = :table_name
PRIMARY_KEY = :primary_key
OLD_INDEX_NAME = :old_index_name
NEW_INDEX_NAME = :new_index_name
def up
swap_primary_key(TABLE_NAME, PRIMARY_KEY, NEW_INDEX_NAME)
end
def down
add_concurrent_index(TABLE_NAME, :id, unique: true, name: OLD_INDEX_NAME)
add_concurrent_index(TABLE_NAME, [:id, :partition_id], unique: true, name: NEW_INDEX_NAME)
unswap_primary_key(TABLE_NAME, PRIMARY_KEY, OLD_INDEX_NAME)
end
end
NOTE:
Do not forget to set the primary key explicitly in your model as ActiveRecord
does not support composite primary keys.
class Model < ApplicationRecord
self.primary_key = :id
end
Step 6 - Create parent table and attach existing table as the initial partition
You can now create the parent table attaching the existing table as the initial partition by using the following helpers provided by the database team.
For example, using list partitioning in Rails post migrations:
class PrepareTableConstraintsForListPartitioning < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
include Gitlab::Database::PartitioningMigrationHelpers::TableManagementHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
TABLE_NAME = :table_name
PARENT_TABLE_NAME = :p_table_name
FIRST_PARTITION = 100
PARTITION_COLUMN = :partition_id
def up
prepare_constraint_for_list_partitioning(
table_name: TABLE_NAME,
partitioning_column: PARTITION_COLUMN,
parent_table_name: PARENT_TABLE_NAME,
initial_partitioning_value: FIRST_PARTITION
)
end
def down
revert_preparing_constraint_for_list_partitioning(
table_name: TABLE_NAME,
partitioning_column: PARTITION_COLUMN,
parent_table_name: PARENT_TABLE_NAME,
initial_partitioning_value: FIRST_PARTITION
)
end
end
class ConvertTableToListPartitioning < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
include Gitlab::Database::PartitioningMigrationHelpers::TableManagementHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
TABLE_NAME = :table_name
TABLE_FK = :table_references_by_fk
PARENT_TABLE_NAME = :p_table_name
FIRST_PARTITION = 100
PARTITION_COLUMN = :partition_id
def up
convert_table_to_first_list_partition(
table_name: TABLE_NAME,
partitioning_column: PARTITION_COLUMN,
parent_table_name: PARENT_TABLE_NAME,
initial_partitioning_value: FIRST_PARTITION,
lock_tables: [TABLE_FK, TABLE_NAME]
)
end
def down
revert_converting_table_to_first_list_partition(
table_name: TABLE_NAME,
partitioning_column: PARTITION_COLUMN,
parent_table_name: PARENT_TABLE_NAME,
initial_partitioning_value: FIRST_PARTITION
)
end
end
NOTE:
Do not forget to set the sequence name explicitly in your model because it will
be owned by the routing table and ActiveRecord
can't determine it. This can
be cleaned up after the table_name
is changed to the routing table.
class Model < ApplicationRecord
self.sequence_name = 'model_id_seq'
end
If the partitioning constraint migration takes more than 10 minutes to finish, it can be made to run asynchronously to avoid running the post-migration during busy hours.
Prepend the following migration AsyncPrepareTableConstraintsForListPartitioning
and use async: true
option. This change marks the partitioning constraint as NOT VALID
and enqueues a scheduled job to validate the existing data in the table during the weekend.
Then the second post-migration PrepareTableConstraintsForListPartitioning
only
marks the partitioning constraint as validated, because the existing data is already
tested during the previous weekend.
For example:
class AsyncPrepareTableConstraintsForListPartitioning < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
include Gitlab::Database::PartitioningMigrationHelpers::TableManagementHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
TABLE_NAME = :table_name
PARENT_TABLE_NAME = :p_table_name
FIRST_PARTITION = 100
PARTITION_COLUMN = :partition_id
def up
prepare_constraint_for_list_partitioning(
table_name: TABLE_NAME,
partitioning_column: PARTITION_COLUMN,
parent_table_name: PARENT_TABLE_NAME,
initial_partitioning_value: FIRST_PARTITION,
async: true
)
end
def down
revert_preparing_constraint_for_list_partitioning(
table_name: TABLE_NAME,
partitioning_column: PARTITION_COLUMN,
parent_table_name: PARENT_TABLE_NAME,
initial_partitioning_value: FIRST_PARTITION
)
end
end
Step 7 - Re-point foreign keys to parent table
The tables that reference the initial partition must be updated to point to the parent table now. Without this change, the records from those tables will not be able to locate the rows in the next partitions because they will look for them in the initial partition.
Steps:
- Add the foreign key to the partitioned table and validate it asynchronously, for example.
- Validate it synchronously after the asynchronously validation was completed on GitLab.com, for example.
- Remove the old foreign key and rename the new one to the old name, for example.
Step 8 - Ensure ID uniqueness across partitions
All uniqueness constraints must include the partitioning key, so we can have duplicate IDs across partitions. To solve this we enforce that only the database can set the ID values and use a sequence to generate them because sequences are guaranteed to generate unique values.
For example:
class EnsureIdUniquenessForPCiBuilds < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
include Gitlab::Database::PartitioningMigrationHelpers::UniquenessHelpers
enable_lock_retries!
TABLE_NAME = :p_ci_builds
FUNCTION_NAME = :assign_p_ci_builds_id_value
def up
ensure_unique_id(TABLE_NAME)
end
def down
execute(<<~SQL.squish)
ALTER TABLE #{TABLE_NAME}
ALTER COLUMN id SET DEFAULT nextval('ci_builds_id_seq'::regclass);
DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS #{FUNCTION_NAME} CASCADE;
SQL
end
Step 9 - Analyze the partitioned table and create new partitions
The autovacuum daemon does not process partitioned tables. It is necessary to
periodically run a manual ANALYZE
to keep the statistics of the table hierarchy
up to date.
Models that implement Ci::Partitionable
with partitioned: true
option are
analyzed by default on a weekly basis. To enable this and create new partitions
you need to register the model in the PostgreSQL initializer.
Step 10 - Update the application to use the partitioned table
Now that the parent table is ready, we can update the application to use it:
class Model < ApplicationRecord
self.table_name = :partitioned_table
end
Depending on the model, it might be safer to use a change management issue.